Case Summary Grutter V. Bollinger - 842 Words

Case Summary: Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) involved a white Michigan resident named Barbara Grutter and the University of Michigan Law School. Grutter was frustrated by her rejection from the Law School, claiming that the University’s decision was due to a discriminatory admission policy which sought to enroll greater amounts of underrepresented minority students. Grutter believed that white candidates possessed a disadvantage due to this policy and she sued the university. According to Grutter, race was the â€Å"predominate factor† in selecting applicants instead of academics. She argued that the policy was unconstitutional and that it violated her 14th Amendment rights. In response to the allegations, the University of Michigan asserted that their policy was designed to promote diversity and ensure â€Å"unique contributions to the character of the Law School† (Cornell University Law School, n.d.). The University of Michigan maintained that they did not employ racial quotas rather they systemically focused on improving diversity in each entering class. The University associated their policy to Regents of Uni. Cal. v. Bakke (1978) which addressed race in university admission decisions. Legal Question: The legal issue presented in this case ultimately questioned the University of Michigan’s admission policy which sought a more diverse student body. The court addressed whether the University of Michigan’s use of racial preferences in the admission process violatedShow MoreRelatedThe Law Of Admissions Standards1883 Words   |  8 PagesIt’s impossible to prophesy on what types of cases will arise. And it’s doubtful that anyone could have predicted the issues that would come with university admissions standards. Because lets be honest, no school wants to be viewed as the dunderhead who rejected the next Shakespeare or Aristotle. Many factors can play a role: GPA, SAT scores, extracurricular activities, and other academically related aspects, are always going to be taken into consideration. But there’s one other factor—it’s the oneRead MoreCivil Rights And The Bill Of Rights Essay1280 Words   |  6 PagesBill of Rights on November 7, 1972. This means that all the people of the State of Texas have the right to be treated equally and fair regardless of our race, sex, color, creed or national origin. Brown v. Board of Education is a perfect example of the application of Article 1Section 3a. In this case there was a young lady named Linda Brown that has forced to go to school at a school across town, with a large minority population instead of going to a school that was closer to her house that had a largeRead MoreFemale Employee Orientation At Fairview County Public Library2148 Words   |  9 PagesFisher v. the University of Texas at Austin gave the lower court a crack at deciding whether the school’s policy passes constitutional muster-for the school to prove the need for considering race among admission factors† NC Joins NY, 12 Other States to Back Affirmative Action Policy. â€Å"The parties on both sides claimed victory after the court’s ruling that making a good faith effort to increase diversity is not enough under the court’s strict scrutiny analysis established in the 1978 case RegentsRead MoreEducation response Essay example43180 Words   |   173 PagesHigher Education Can Advance Social Mobility A progress report by the Independent Reviewer on Social Mobility and Child Poverty October 2012 University Challenge: How Higher Education Can Advance Social Mobility Contents Foreword and summary 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 11 Chapter 2 Access all areas 19 Chapter 3 Making the grade 27 Chapter 4 Getting ready – reaching out to potential applicants 33 Chapter 5 Getting in – university admissions